lack: be cause of poverty

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, reason
Weight: 0.61
, ability
Weight: 0.61
, symptom
Weight: 0.61
Siblings absence
Weight: 0.64
, poor people
Weight: 0.60
, apathy
Weight: 0.34
, laziness
Weight: 0.34
, characteristic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cause of poverty 1.00
cause poverty 1.00
escape poverty 0.89
cause unemployment 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lack, be cause of poverty)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(poor people, escape poverty)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(lack, be cause of poverty)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(poor people, escape poverty)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(poor people, escape poverty)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(lack, be cause of poverty)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(lack, be cause of poverty)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(lack, be cause of poverty)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(lack, cause poverty)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(lack, be cause of poverty)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(lack, cause poverty)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(lack, be cause of poverty)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(lack, cause poverty)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(lack, be cause of poverty)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lack, cause poverty)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(lack, be cause of poverty)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(lack, cause unemployment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(lack, be cause of poverty)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(lack, cause unemployment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(lack, be cause of poverty)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(lack, cause unemployment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(lack, be cause of poverty)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lack, cause unemployment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(lack, be cause of poverty)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(lack, be cause of poverty)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lack, be cause of poverty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(lack, be cause of poverty)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(lack, be cause of poverty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lack, be cause of poverty)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(poor people, escape poverty)