lack: be hazard in sport

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, reason
Weight: 0.61
, ability
Weight: 0.61
, symptom
Weight: 0.61
Siblings absence
Weight: 0.64
, poor people
Weight: 0.60
, apathy
Weight: 0.34
, laziness
Weight: 0.34
, characteristic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hazard in sport 1.00
be important in sport 0.80
be barrier in sport 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(ability, be important in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(lack, be hazard in sport)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ability, be barrier in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(lack, be hazard in sport)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(lack, be hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(ability, be barrier in sport)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(lack, be hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ability, be important in sport)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(lack, be hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ability, be barrier in sport)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(lack, be hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ability, be important in sport)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(ability, be important in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(lack, be hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(lack, be hazard in sport)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ability, be barrier in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(lack, be hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(lack, be hazard in sport)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(lack, be hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(lack, be hazard in sport)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(lack, be hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(lack, be hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(lack, be hazard in sport)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(lack, be hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(lack, be hazard in sport)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(lack, be hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(ability, be barrier in sport)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(lack, be hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(ability, be important in sport)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(lack, be hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(ability, be important in sport)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(lack, be hazard in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(ability, be barrier in sport)