lacrosse player: has physical part hair

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.65
, student
Weight: 0.62
Siblings hockey player
Weight: 0.40
, football player
Weight: 0.39
, tennis player
Weight: 0.39
, soccer player
Weight: 0.39
, wrestler
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part hair 1.00
have long hair 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, have long hair)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wrestler, have long hair)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(football player, have long hair)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wrestler, has physical part hair)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(lacrosse player, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wrestler, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(wrestler, has physical part hair)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(lacrosse player, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(football player, have long hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(football player, have long hair)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(lacrosse player, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wrestler, have long hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(wrestler, have long hair)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(lacrosse player, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(hockey player, have long hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hockey player, have long hair)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(lacrosse player, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(lacrosse player, has physical part hair)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(lacrosse player, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, have long hair)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(lacrosse player, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(lacrosse player, have long hair)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(lacrosse player, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(lacrosse player, have long hair)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(lacrosse player, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(lacrosse player, have long hair)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(lacrosse player, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(lacrosse player, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, has physical part hair)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(lacrosse player, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(lacrosse player, has physical part hair)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(wrestler, has physical part hair)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wrestler, have long hair)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(football player, have long hair)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hockey player, have long hair)