lacrosse player: have tape on helmets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.65
, student
Weight: 0.62
Siblings hockey player
Weight: 0.40
, football player
Weight: 0.39
, tennis player
Weight: 0.39
, soccer player
Weight: 0.39
, wrestler
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have tape on helmets 1.00
tape helmets 0.99
put tape on helmets 0.98
wear goggles 0.77
wear gloves 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(football player, wear gloves)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(football player, wear gloves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(football player, wear gloves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(lacrosse player, put tape on helmets)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, put tape on helmets)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(lacrosse player, put tape on helmets)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, tape helmets)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(lacrosse player, tape helmets)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(lacrosse player, tape helmets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(lacrosse player, put tape on helmets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lacrosse player, tape helmets)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(lacrosse player, wear goggles)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, wear goggles)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(lacrosse player, wear goggles)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(lacrosse player, wear goggles)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(lacrosse player, wear gloves)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, wear gloves)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lacrosse player, wear gloves)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(lacrosse player, wear gloves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse player, have tape on helmets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(football player, wear gloves)