ladybug: control aphids population

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.73
, predator
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, bug
Weight: 0.51
Siblings dung beetle
Weight: 0.37
, moth
Weight: 0.36
, beetle
Weight: 0.36
, aphid
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
control aphids population 1.00
eat aphids 0.93
is insects 0.84
is insect 0.83
is state insect 0.83
is beetles 0.83
has state pests 0.82
is arthropods 0.76
be arthropods 0.76
produce baby ladybugs 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(insect, is insects)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ladybug, control aphids population)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(insect, is insects)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(insect, is insects)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(aphid, has state pests)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beetle, is insects)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(beetle, is insect)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(insect, is insects)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(ladybug, control aphids population)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beetle, is insects)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(beetle, is insects)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(beetle, is insect)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(beetle, is insect)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(aphid, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(aphid, has state pests)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ladybug, control aphids population)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(ladybug, eat aphids)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, eat aphids)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(ladybug, eat aphids)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(ladybug, is insects)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(ladybug, is insect)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(ladybug, is insects)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(ladybug, is insect)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(ladybug, is insects)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(ladybug, eat aphids)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(ladybug, is insect)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(ladybug, be arthropods)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, is insects)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, is insect)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(ladybug, be arthropods)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ladybug, be arthropods)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, be arthropods)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, control aphids population)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ladybug, control aphids population)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(insect, is insects)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(beetle, is insect)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(beetle, is insects)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(aphid, has state pests)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(ladybug, control aphids population)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(insect, is insects)