ladybug: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.73
, predator
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, bug
Weight: 0.51
Siblings gypsy moth
Weight: 0.38
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.37
, moth
Weight: 0.36
, beetle
Weight: 0.36
, aphid
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
be bad year 0.79
be good for environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ladybug, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bug, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bug, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(aphid, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(aphid, be bad year)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(gypsy moth, be bad year)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(beetle, be bad year)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(dung beetle, be good for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(beetle, be good for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(ladybug, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(aphid, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(aphid, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(gypsy moth, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(gypsy moth, be bad year)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(beetle, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(beetle, be bad year)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(aphid, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(aphid, be bad year)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(beetle, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(beetle, be good for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(dung beetle, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(dung beetle, be good for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(ladybug, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ladybug, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bug, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(aphid, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(gypsy moth, be bad year)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(aphid, be bad year)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(dung beetle, be good for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(beetle, be bad year)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(beetle, be good for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(ladybug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bug, has quality bad)