lake superior: have best water quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lake
Weight: 0.76
, river
Weight: 0.68
, area
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.60
, ocean
Weight: 0.57
Siblings lake champlain
Weight: 0.42
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.42
, lake erie
Weight: 0.41
, lake geneva
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
have best water quality 1.00
have water quality 0.93
be called lake superior 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(lake, be called lake superior)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(lake superior, have best water quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(lake superior, have best water quality)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(lake, be called lake superior)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(lake superior, have best water quality)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(lake, be called lake superior)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(lake, be called lake superior)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(lake superior, have best water quality)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(lake superior, have best water quality)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(lake superior, have best water quality)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(lake superior, have best water quality)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(lake superior, have best water quality)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(lake superior, have water quality)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(lake superior, have best water quality)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(lake superior, have water quality)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(lake superior, have best water quality)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(lake superior, have water quality)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(lake superior, have best water quality)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(lake superior, be called lake superior)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(lake superior, have best water quality)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(lake superior, have water quality)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(lake superior, have best water quality)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(lake superior, be called lake superior)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(lake superior, have best water quality)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(lake superior, be called lake superior)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(lake superior, have best water quality)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(lake superior, be called lake superior)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(lake superior, have best water quality)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(lake superior, have best water quality)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(lake superior, have best water quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(lake superior, have best water quality)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(lake superior, have best water quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(lake superior, have best water quality)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(lake, be called lake superior)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(lake superior, have best water quality)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(lake, be called lake superior)