lake superior: was formed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lake
Weight: 0.76
, river
Weight: 0.68
, area
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.60
, ocean
Weight: 0.57
Siblings lake champlain
Weight: 0.42
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.42
, lake erie
Weight: 0.41
, lake geneva
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
was formed 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lake superior, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lake tahoe, was formed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(lake superior, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(lake tahoe, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(lake tahoe, was formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(lake superior, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(lake superior, was formed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(lake superior, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(lake superior, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lake superior, was formed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(lake superior, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(lake superior, was formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lake superior, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lake tahoe, was formed)