lake: be at park

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents freshwater
Weight: 0.64
, valley
Weight: 0.63
, spring
Weight: 0.62
, salt water
Weight: 0.61
Siblings great salt lake
Weight: 0.80
, marsh
Weight: 0.59
, creek
Weight: 0.56
, crater
Weight: 0.50
, sea water
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at park 1.00
be at state park 0.91
be used to recreation 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lake, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(creek, be at park)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(lake, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(creek, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(creek, be at park)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(lake, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(lake, be at park)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(lake, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(lake, be at state park)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(lake, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(lake, be at state park)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(lake, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(lake, be at state park)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(lake, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(lake, be used to recreation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(lake, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(lake, be at state park)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(lake, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(lake, be used to recreation)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(lake, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(lake, be used to recreation)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(lake, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(lake, be used to recreation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(lake, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(lake, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lake, be at park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(lake, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(lake, be at park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lake, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(creek, be at park)