lake: be contaminated with rain

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reservoir
Weight: 0.70
, wetland
Weight: 0.68
, freshwater
Weight: 0.64
, valley
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lake champlain
Weight: 0.89
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.87
, lake erie
Weight: 0.85
, great salt lake
Weight: 0.80
, lake constance
Weight: 0.79

Related properties

Property Similarity
be contaminated with rain 1.00
be contaminated with rain treated 0.97
be contaminated with acid rain 0.97
be contaminated with acid rain treated 0.95
be polluted 0.78
get after rain storm 0.78
get polluted 0.78
is polluted 0.78
be life affected by water pollution 0.77
be become polluted 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(freshwater, be life affected by water pollution)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(lake, be contaminated with rain)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lake, be contaminated with rain)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(freshwater, be life affected by water pollution)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(lake, be contaminated with rain)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, be life affected by water pollution)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(lake, be contaminated with rain)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(lake erie, is polluted)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(lake, be contaminated with rain)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lake champlain, is polluted)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(lake, be contaminated with rain)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lake erie, be become polluted)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(freshwater, be life affected by water pollution)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(lake, be contaminated with rain)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lake, be contaminated with rain)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lake, be contaminated with rain)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(lake champlain, is polluted)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(lake champlain, is polluted)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lake, be contaminated with rain)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(lake erie, is polluted)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(lake erie, is polluted)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lake, be contaminated with rain)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(lake erie, be become polluted)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(lake erie, be become polluted)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lake, be contaminated with rain)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(lake, be contaminated with rain)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(lake, be contaminated with rain)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(lake, be contaminated with acid rain treated)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(lake, be contaminated with rain)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(lake, be contaminated with acid rain treated)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(lake, be contaminated with rain)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(lake, be contaminated with acid rain treated)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lake, be contaminated with rain)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(lake, be contaminated with acid rain treated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(lake, be contaminated with rain)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(lake, be contaminated with rain)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(lake, be contaminated with rain)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lake, be contaminated with rain)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(lake, be contaminated with rain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(lake, be contaminated with rain)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(freshwater, be life affected by water pollution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(lake, be contaminated with rain)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lake champlain, is polluted)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(lake, be contaminated with rain)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(lake erie, is polluted)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(lake, be contaminated with rain)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(lake erie, be become polluted)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(lake, be contaminated with rain)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(freshwater, be life affected by water pollution)