lake: be important in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reservoir
Weight: 0.70
, wetland
Weight: 0.68
, freshwater
Weight: 0.64
, valley
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lake champlain
Weight: 0.89
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.87
, lake erie
Weight: 0.85
, great salt lake
Weight: 0.80
, lake constance
Weight: 0.79

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in canada 1.00
be important to canada 1.00
be in canada blue 0.92
be in western australia 0.81
be in australia pink 0.81
have in australia pink 0.81
be important in singapore 0.81
be in mexico 0.79
is important minnesota 0.79
exist in florida 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(reservoir, be important in singapore)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lake, be important in canada)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(freshwater, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lake, be important in canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lake, be important in canada)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(freshwater, be important to canada)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lake, be important in canada)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(reservoir, be important in singapore)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(lake, be important in canada)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, be important to canada)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(lake, be important in canada)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(reservoir, be important in singapore)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(freshwater, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(lake, be important in canada)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(lake, be important in canada)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(reservoir, be important in singapore)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(lake, be important in canada)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(lake, be important in canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lake, be important in canada)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(lake, be important in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lake, be important in canada)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(lake, be important to canada)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lake, be important in canada)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(lake, be important to canada)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(lake, be important in canada)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(lake, be important to canada)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lake, be important in canada)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(lake, exist in florida)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(lake, be important in canada)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(lake, exist in florida)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lake, be important in canada)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(lake, exist in florida)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(lake, be important in canada)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lake, be important to canada)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(lake, be important in canada)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(lake, exist in florida)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(lake, be important in canada)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lake, be important in canada)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(lake, be important in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lake, be important in canada)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lake, be important in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(lake, be important in canada)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(freshwater, be important to canada)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(lake, be important in canada)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(reservoir, be important in singapore)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lake, be important in canada)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(freshwater, be important to canada)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lake, be important in canada)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(reservoir, be important in singapore)