lake: be treated with limestone powder

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reservoir
Weight: 0.70
, wetland
Weight: 0.68
, freshwater
Weight: 0.64
, valley
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lake champlain
Weight: 0.89
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.87
, lake erie
Weight: 0.85
, great salt lake
Weight: 0.80
, lake constance
Weight: 0.79

Related properties

Property Similarity
be treated with limestone powder 1.00
be contaminated with acid rain treated 0.76
have sand 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lake, be treated with limestone powder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(lake, be treated with limestone powder)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lake, be treated with limestone powder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(lake, have sand)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(lake, be treated with limestone powder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(lake, have sand)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(lake, be treated with limestone powder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(lake, be contaminated with acid rain treated)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(lake, be treated with limestone powder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lake, have sand)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(lake, be treated with limestone powder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(lake, have sand)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(lake, be treated with limestone powder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(lake, be contaminated with acid rain treated)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(lake, be treated with limestone powder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(lake, be contaminated with acid rain treated)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lake, be treated with limestone powder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(lake, be contaminated with acid rain treated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(lake, be treated with limestone powder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lake, be treated with limestone powder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lake, be treated with limestone powder)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lake, be treated with limestone powder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lake, be treated with limestone powder)