lake: be used in texas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reservoir
Weight: 0.70
, wetland
Weight: 0.68
, freshwater
Weight: 0.64
, valley
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lake champlain
Weight: 0.89
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.87
, lake erie
Weight: 0.85
, great salt lake
Weight: 0.80
, lake constance
Weight: 0.79

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in texas 1.00
is minnesota 0.81
be lanier important to georgia 0.81
exist in florida 0.81
is important minnesota 0.81
is nevada white 0.81
be in mexico 0.79
be in utah salty 0.79
is michigan 0.79
is ohio 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lake, be used in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(great salt lake, be in utah salty)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lake, be used in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(lake erie, is ohio)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(lake, be used in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(great salt lake, be in utah salty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(great salt lake, be in utah salty)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(lake, be used in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(lake erie, is ohio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(lake erie, is ohio)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(lake, be used in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(lake, be used in texas)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(lake, be used in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(lake, exist in florida)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(lake, be used in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(lake, exist in florida)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(lake, be used in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(lake, exist in florida)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(lake, be used in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(lake, exist in florida)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(lake, be used in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(lake, be used in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lake, be used in texas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(lake, be used in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(lake, be used in texas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lake, be used in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(great salt lake, be in utah salty)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lake, be used in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(lake erie, is ohio)