lake: become dry land

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reservoir
Weight: 0.70
, wetland
Weight: 0.68
, freshwater
Weight: 0.64
, valley
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lake champlain
Weight: 0.89
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.87
, lake erie
Weight: 0.85
, great salt lake
Weight: 0.80
, lake constance
Weight: 0.79

Related properties

Property Similarity
become dry land 1.00
become land 0.90
protect land areas 0.78
has state wet 0.76
protect surrounding land areas 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(wetland, protect surrounding land areas)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(lake, become dry land)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wetland, has state wet)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(lake, become dry land)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(lake, become dry land)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(wetland, has state wet)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(lake, become dry land)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(wetland, protect surrounding land areas)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(lake, become dry land)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(wetland, has state wet)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(lake, become dry land)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(wetland, protect surrounding land areas)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(wetland, protect surrounding land areas)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(lake, become dry land)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(lake, become dry land)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wetland, has state wet)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(lake, become dry land)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(lake, become dry land)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(lake, become dry land)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(lake, become dry land)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(lake, become dry land)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(lake, become dry land)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(lake, become dry land)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(lake, become dry land)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(lake, become dry land)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(lake, become dry land)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(wetland, protect surrounding land areas)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(lake, become dry land)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wetland, has state wet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(lake, become dry land)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(wetland, protect surrounding land areas)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(lake, become dry land)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wetland, has state wet)