lake: freeze from top to bottom

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reservoir
Weight: 0.70
, wetland
Weight: 0.68
, freshwater
Weight: 0.64
, valley
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lake champlain
Weight: 0.89
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.87
, lake erie
Weight: 0.85
, great salt lake
Weight: 0.80
, lake constance
Weight: 0.79

Related properties

Property Similarity
freeze from top to bottom 1.00
freeze from top towards bottom 0.96
freeze from top 0.95
freeze from top tp bottom 0.95
freeze down from top 0.94
freeze from top down 0.94
freeze from top to bottom chemistry 0.93
freeze from tp bottom 0.91
freeze from top to chemistry 0.87
freeze 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lake, freeze from top to bottom)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(lake, freeze from top to bottom)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(lake, freeze from top to bottom)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(lake, freeze)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(lake, freeze from top to bottom)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(lake, freeze)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lake, freeze from top to bottom)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(lake, freeze)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(lake, freeze from top to bottom)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(lake, freeze down from top)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(lake, freeze from top to bottom)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lake, freeze from top)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(lake, freeze from top to bottom)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(lake, freeze down from top)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(lake, freeze from top to bottom)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lake, freeze)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(lake, freeze from top to bottom)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(lake, freeze from top)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lake, freeze from top to bottom)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(lake, freeze down from top)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(lake, freeze from top to bottom)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(lake, freeze down from top)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(lake, freeze from top to bottom)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lake, freeze from top)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lake, freeze from top to bottom)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(lake, freeze from top)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(lake, freeze from top to bottom)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lake, freeze from top to bottom)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(lake, freeze from top to bottom)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lake, freeze from top to bottom)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lake, freeze from top to bottom)