laker: wear uniforms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents los angeles
Weight: 0.51
, team
Weight: 0.50
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, game
Weight: 0.43
, event
Weight: 0.40
Siblings basketball team
Weight: 0.31
, las vegas
Weight: 0.31
, cleveland
Weight: 0.31
, seattle
Weight: 0.30
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear uniforms 1.00
wear blue uniforms 0.97
have uniforms 0.96
have blue uniforms 0.94
wear mpls jerseys 0.89
wear jerseys 0.89
wear blue jerseys 0.89
wear mpls 0.88
wear blue 0.85
wear yellow 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(team, wear blue)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(laker, wear uniforms)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(laker, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(team, wear blue)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(laker, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(team, wear blue)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(team, wear blue)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(laker, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(laker, wear uniforms)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(laker, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(laker, wear uniforms)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(laker, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(laker, wear mpls)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(laker, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(laker, have blue uniforms)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(laker, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(laker, wear blue uniforms)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(laker, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(laker, wear mpls jerseys)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(laker, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(laker, have uniforms)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(laker, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(laker, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(laker, wear uniforms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(laker, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(laker, wear uniforms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(laker, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(team, wear blue)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(laker, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(team, wear blue)