lamborghini: have engines in back

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents car
Weight: 0.55
, name
Weight: 0.48
, brand
Weight: 0.48
, company
Weight: 0.44
, manufacturer
Weight: 0.44
Siblings police car
Weight: 0.28
, ferrari
Weight: 0.28
, jeep
Weight: 0.28
, buick
Weight: 0.28
, mercedes benz
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
have engines in back 1.00
is cars 0.75
is 2-seater cars 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lamborghini, have engines in back)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jeep, is cars)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lamborghini, have engines in back)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(jeep, is cars)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(jeep, is cars)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lamborghini, have engines in back)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(lamborghini, have engines in back)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(lamborghini, have engines in back)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(lamborghini, is cars)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(lamborghini, have engines in back)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(lamborghini, is 2-seater cars)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lamborghini, have engines in back)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lamborghini, is cars)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(lamborghini, have engines in back)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(lamborghini, is cars)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lamborghini, have engines in back)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(lamborghini, is 2-seater cars)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(lamborghini, have engines in back)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(lamborghini, is 2-seater cars)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lamborghini, have engines in back)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(lamborghini, is cars)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lamborghini, have engines in back)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(lamborghini, is 2-seater cars)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(lamborghini, have engines in back)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(lamborghini, have engines in back)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lamborghini, have engines in back)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lamborghini, have engines in back)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(lamborghini, have engines in back)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lamborghini, have engines in back)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(jeep, is cars)