lamborghini: have scissor doors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents car
Weight: 0.55
, name
Weight: 0.48
, brand
Weight: 0.48
, company
Weight: 0.44
, manufacturer
Weight: 0.44
Siblings police car
Weight: 0.28
, ferrari
Weight: 0.28
, jeep
Weight: 0.28
, buick
Weight: 0.28
, mercedes benz
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
have scissor doors 1.00
have doors 0.82
have butterfly doors 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(lamborghini, have scissor doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(police car, have doors)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(lamborghini, have scissor doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(police car, have doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(police car, have doors)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(lamborghini, have scissor doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(lamborghini, have scissor doors)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(lamborghini, have scissor doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(lamborghini, have doors)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(lamborghini, have scissor doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(lamborghini, have butterfly doors)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(lamborghini, have scissor doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(lamborghini, have butterfly doors)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(lamborghini, have scissor doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(lamborghini, have butterfly doors)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(lamborghini, have scissor doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(lamborghini, have doors)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(lamborghini, have scissor doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(lamborghini, have doors)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(lamborghini, have scissor doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(lamborghini, have butterfly doors)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(lamborghini, have scissor doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(lamborghini, have doors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(lamborghini, have scissor doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(lamborghini, have scissor doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(lamborghini, have scissor doors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(lamborghini, have scissor doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(lamborghini, have scissor doors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(lamborghini, have scissor doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(police car, have doors)