lamp: has quality plus

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accessory
Weight: 0.62
, household appliance
Weight: 0.62
, object
Weight: 0.60
, light source
Weight: 0.59
Siblings light bulb
Weight: 0.72
, halogen
Weight: 0.57
, led
Weight: 0.53
, searchlight
Weight: 0.45
, parlor
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality plus 1.00
has quality good 0.84
has quality bad 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(light source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lamp, has quality plus)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(lamp, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(light source, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(lamp, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(light source, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(lamp, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(light bulb, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(lamp, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(led, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(light source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(lamp, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lamp, has quality plus)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(lamp, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(led, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(led, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(lamp, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(light bulb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(light bulb, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(lamp, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(lamp, has quality plus)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(lamp, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(lamp, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(lamp, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(lamp, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(lamp, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lamp, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(lamp, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(lamp, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lamp, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(lamp, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lamp, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(lamp, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(lamp, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lamp, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(lamp, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(lamp, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(lamp, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lamp, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(lamp, has quality plus)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(lamp, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lamp, has quality plus)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(lamp, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(light source, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(lamp, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(light bulb, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(lamp, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(led, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lamp, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(light source, has quality good)