landfill: have bad sites

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings recycling
Weight: 0.35
, chemical plant
Weight: 0.34
, water plant
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.33
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bad sites 1.00
have sites 0.95
be bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(landfill, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(landfill, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(recycling, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(recycling, be bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(landfill, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(landfill, have bad sites)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(landfill, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(landfill, have sites)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(landfill, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(landfill, have sites)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(landfill, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(landfill, have sites)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(landfill, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(landfill, have sites)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(landfill, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(landfill, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(landfill, have bad sites)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(landfill, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(landfill, have bad sites)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(landfill, have bad sites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(recycling, be bad)