landfill: is located

Related concepts

Parents	project Weight: 0.63 , facility Weight: 0.58 , source Weight: 0.55 , issue Weight: 0.54
Siblings	recycling Weight: 0.35 , chemical plant Weight: 0.34 , water plant Weight: 0.34 , construction site Weight: 0.33 , nuclear power plant Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is located	1.00
be located in areas	0.91
be located near water	0.91
be located in coastal areas	0.81
be built near water	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(landfill, is located) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be located in coastal areas)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(landfill, is located) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be built near water)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(landfill, is located) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be located near water)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(landfill, is located) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be located in areas)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(landfill, is located) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be located in areas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be located in areas)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(landfill, is located) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be located near water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be located near water)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(landfill, is located) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be located in coastal areas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be located in coastal areas)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(landfill, is located) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be built near water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be built near water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(landfill, is located) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(landfill, is located)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(landfill, is located) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(landfill, is located) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(landfill, is located)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(landfill, is located) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(landfill, is located)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(landfill, is located) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be located in areas)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(landfill, is located) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be located near water)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(landfill, is located) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be located in coastal areas)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(landfill, is located) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be built near water)