landfill: use cover

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings recycling
Weight: 0.35
, chemical plant
Weight: 0.34
, water plant
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.33
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
use cover 1.00
use daily cover 0.88
use 110v 0.77
be covered in lights 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(landfill, use cover) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(chemical plant, be covered in lights)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(landfill, use cover) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(construction site, use 110v)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(landfill, use cover) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(chemical plant, be covered in lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(chemical plant, be covered in lights)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(landfill, use cover) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(construction site, use 110v) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(construction site, use 110v)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(landfill, use cover) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(landfill, use cover)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(landfill, use cover) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(landfill, use daily cover)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(landfill, use cover) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(landfill, use daily cover)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(landfill, use cover) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(landfill, use daily cover)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(landfill, use cover) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(landfill, use daily cover)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(landfill, use cover) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(landfill, use cover) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(landfill, use cover)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(landfill, use cover) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(landfill, use cover)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(landfill, use cover) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(chemical plant, be covered in lights)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(landfill, use cover) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(construction site, use 110v)