landing: was on moon bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents maneuver
Weight: 0.69
, operation
Weight: 0.63
, place
Weight: 0.60
, time
Weight: 0.60
Siblings runway
Weight: 0.54
, soft
Weight: 0.48
, takeoff
Weight: 0.35
, docking
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was on moon bad 1.00
was on moon 0.96
was on moon one giant leap for mankind 0.84
was on moon one giant leap 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(landing, was on moon bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(landing, was on moon bad)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(landing, was on moon bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(landing, was on moon)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(landing, was on moon bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(landing, was on moon)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(landing, was on moon bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(landing, was on moon)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(landing, was on moon bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(landing, was on moon)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(landing, was on moon bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(landing, was on moon one giant leap)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(landing, was on moon bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(landing, was on moon one giant leap)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(landing, was on moon bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(landing, was on moon one giant leap)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(landing, was on moon bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(landing, was on moon one giant leap for mankind)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(landing, was on moon bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(landing, was on moon one giant leap)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(landing, was on moon bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(landing, was on moon one giant leap for mankind)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(landing, was on moon bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(landing, was on moon one giant leap for mankind)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(landing, was on moon bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(landing, was on moon one giant leap for mankind)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(landing, was on moon bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(landing, was on moon bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(landing, was on moon bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(landing, was on moon bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(landing, was on moon bad)