landmark: be used to visit

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, property
Weight: 0.55
, time
Weight: 0.54
Siblings city hall
Weight: 0.69
, golden gate bridge
Weight: 0.68
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.66
, bridge
Weight: 0.65
, castle
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to visit 1.00
be used to visit in paris 0.80
be used to visit while in landmark city 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(landmark, be used to visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(eiffel tower, be used to visit in paris)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(landmark, be used to visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(eiffel tower, be used to visit in paris) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(eiffel tower, be used to visit in paris)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(landmark, be used to visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(landmark, be used to visit)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(landmark, be used to visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(landmark, be used to visit while in landmark city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(landmark, be used to visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(landmark, be used to visit while in landmark city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(landmark, be used to visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(landmark, be used to visit while in landmark city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(landmark, be used to visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(landmark, be used to visit while in landmark city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(landmark, be used to visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(landmark, be used to visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(landmark, be used to visit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(landmark, be used to visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(landmark, be used to visit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(landmark, be used to visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(eiffel tower, be used to visit in paris)