landmine: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents explosive
Weight: 0.56
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, weapon
Weight: 0.50
, thing
Weight: 0.49
Siblings pipe bomb
Weight: 0.33
, hand grenade
Weight: 0.33
, dynamite
Weight: 0.32
, submachine gun
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
is problem globally 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(landmine, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(landmine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(landmine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(landmine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(landmine, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(landmine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(landmine, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(landmine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(landmine, is problem globally)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(landmine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(landmine, is problem globally)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(landmine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(landmine, is problem globally)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(landmine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(landmine, is problem globally)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(landmine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(landmine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(landmine, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(landmine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(landmine, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(landmine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(landmine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)