landscape: light expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attraction
Weight: 0.64
, artwork
Weight: 0.62
, style
Weight: 0.61
, scene
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
Siblings central park
Weight: 0.33
, wallpaper
Weight: 0.32
, tapestry
Weight: 0.32
, park
Weight: 0.32
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
light expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(artwork, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(landscape, light expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(landscape, light expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(artwork, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(landscape, light expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(artwork, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(landscape, light expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tapestry, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(landscape, light expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(wallpaper, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(artwork, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(landscape, light expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(landscape, light expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(landscape, light expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(wallpaper, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(wallpaper, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(landscape, light expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tapestry, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(tapestry, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(landscape, light expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(landscape, light expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(landscape, light expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(landscape, light expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(landscape, light expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(landscape, light expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(landscape, light expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(landscape, light expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(artwork, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(landscape, light expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tapestry, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(landscape, light expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(wallpaper, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(landscape, light expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(artwork, is expensive)