language: be important in development

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents programming language
Weight: 0.85
, english language
Weight: 0.85
, sign language
Weight: 0.81
, subject
Weight: 0.63
Siblings italian language
Weight: 0.79
, chinese language
Weight: 0.77
, american sign language
Weight: 0.76
, old english
Weight: 0.75
, haitian creole
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in development 1.00
affect development 0.91
be important in development of nation 0.90
affect national development 0.87
promote development 0.85
be important to samoans 0.82
be important area for research 0.81
be important in business 0.80
be important in critical process 0.80
be important in environment 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(english language, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(language, be important in development)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(english language, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(language, be important in development)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(language, be important in development)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(english language, be important in environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(language, be important in development)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(english language, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in development)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(english language, be important in business)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in development)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(english language, be important in environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(english language, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(language, be important in development)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(language, be important in development)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(english language, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(language, be important in development)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(language, be important in development)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(language, be important in development)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(language, be important in development)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(language, be important in development)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(language, be important in business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(language, be important in development)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(language, be important in development)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(language, be important in business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(language, be important in development)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(language, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(language, be important in development)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(language, be important in development)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in development)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(language, be important in development)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(language, be important in development)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in development)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(english language, be important in environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in development)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(english language, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(language, be important in development)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(english language, be important in environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(language, be important in development)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(english language, be important in business)