language: be used to communication

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents english language
Weight: 0.85
, sign language
Weight: 0.81
, subject
Weight: 0.63
, poetry
Weight: 0.62
Siblings italian language
Weight: 0.79
, lisp
Weight: 0.69
, persian
Weight: 0.67
, prolog
Weight: 0.65
, sql
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to communication 1.00
be form of communication 0.93
be used to communicate 0.81
be used to communicate idea 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(language, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(language, be used to communication)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(language, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(language, be form of communication)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(language, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(language, be form of communication)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(language, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(language, be form of communication)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(language, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(language, be form of communication)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(language, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(language, be used to communicate)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(language, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(language, be used to communicate)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(language, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(language, be used to communicate idea)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(language, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(language, be used to communicate idea)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(language, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(language, be used to communicate)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(language, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(language, be used to communicate idea)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(language, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(language, be used to communicate)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(language, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(language, be used to communicate idea)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(language, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(language, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(language, be used to communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(language, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(language, be used to communication)