lao: be considered undeveloped

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.53
, language
Weight: 0.51
, place
Weight: 0.46
, africa
Weight: 0.41
, script
Weight: 0.38
Siblings chinese language
Weight: 0.33
, lua
Weight: 0.33
, mali
Weight: 0.33
, bengali
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered undeveloped 1.00
is underdeveloped 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(africa, is underdeveloped)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(lao, be considered undeveloped)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(country, is underdeveloped)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(lao, be considered undeveloped)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(lao, be considered undeveloped)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(country, is underdeveloped)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(lao, be considered undeveloped)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(africa, is underdeveloped)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lao, be considered undeveloped)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(country, is underdeveloped)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lao, be considered undeveloped)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(africa, is underdeveloped)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lao, be considered undeveloped)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mali, is underdeveloped)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(africa, is underdeveloped)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(lao, be considered undeveloped)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(lao, be considered undeveloped)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(country, is underdeveloped)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(lao, be considered undeveloped)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(lao, be considered undeveloped)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(lao, be considered undeveloped)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mali, is underdeveloped)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mali, is underdeveloped)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(lao, be considered undeveloped)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(lao, be considered undeveloped)

Similarity expansion

0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(lao, be considered undeveloped)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(lao, is underdeveloped)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(lao, be considered undeveloped)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(lao, is underdeveloped)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(lao, be considered undeveloped)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(lao, is underdeveloped)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(lao, be considered undeveloped)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(lao, is underdeveloped)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(lao, be considered undeveloped)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(lao, be considered undeveloped)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lao, be considered undeveloped)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(lao, be considered undeveloped)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(lao, be considered undeveloped)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lao, be considered undeveloped)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(country, is underdeveloped)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lao, be considered undeveloped)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(africa, is underdeveloped)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lao, be considered undeveloped)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(mali, is underdeveloped)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(lao, be considered undeveloped)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(country, is underdeveloped)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(lao, be considered undeveloped)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(africa, is underdeveloped)