largemouth bass: has physical part mouths

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bass
Weight: 0.79
, fish
Weight: 0.73
, species
Weight: 0.71
, angler
Weight: 0.65
, catfish
Weight: 0.64
Siblings striped bass
Weight: 0.85
, smallmouth bass
Weight: 0.43
, rainbow trout
Weight: 0.41
, double bass
Weight: 0.40
, walleye
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part mouths 1.00
have large mouths 0.90
has physical part eyes 0.85
has physical part lips 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bass, have large mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(bass, has physical part mouths)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(bass, have large mouths)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bass, has physical part mouths)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bass, have large mouths)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(smallmouth bass, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bass, have large mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(smallmouth bass, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(smallmouth bass, has physical part eyes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(largemouth bass, has physical part lips)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(largemouth bass, has physical part lips)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(largemouth bass, has physical part lips)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(largemouth bass, has physical part lips)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(largemouth bass, has physical part eyes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(largemouth bass, has physical part eyes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(largemouth bass, has physical part eyes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(largemouth bass, has physical part eyes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(largemouth bass, have large mouths)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(largemouth bass, have large mouths)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(largemouth bass, have large mouths)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(largemouth bass, have large mouths)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(bass, has physical part mouths)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(bass, have large mouths)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(smallmouth bass, has physical part eyes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(bass, has physical part mouths)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(largemouth bass, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(bass, have large mouths)