larry: is tasting wine

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents guy
Weight: 0.60
, friend
Weight: 0.58
, person
Weight: 0.57
, man
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings john smith
Weight: 0.35
, michael jackson
Weight: 0.35
, jackson
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is tasting wine 1.00
is tasting wine on history channel 0.94
is david tasting wine 0.94
is david tasting wine on history channel 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(larry, is tasting wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(larry, is tasting wine)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(larry, is tasting wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(larry, is tasting wine on history channel)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(larry, is tasting wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(larry, is david tasting wine)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(larry, is tasting wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(larry, is david tasting wine)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(larry, is tasting wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(larry, is tasting wine on history channel)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(larry, is tasting wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(larry, is david tasting wine on history channel)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(larry, is tasting wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(larry, is david tasting wine on history channel)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(larry, is tasting wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(larry, is david tasting wine)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(larry, is tasting wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(larry, is tasting wine on history channel)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(larry, is tasting wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(larry, is david tasting wine)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(larry, is tasting wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(larry, is david tasting wine on history channel)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(larry, is tasting wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(larry, is tasting wine on history channel)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(larry, is tasting wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(larry, is david tasting wine on history channel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(larry, is tasting wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(larry, is tasting wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(larry, is tasting wine)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(larry, is tasting wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(larry, is tasting wine)