laser: assisted liposuction work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.67
, electronic device
Weight: 0.66
, machine
Weight: 0.66
, instrument
Weight: 0.64
Siblings diode
Weight: 0.35
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.35
, optics
Weight: 0.35
, spectrophotometer
Weight: 0.35
, cathode ray tube
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
assisted liposuction work 1.00
be used in surgery 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(laser, assisted liposuction work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, be used in surgery)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(laser, assisted liposuction work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(fiber optics, be used in surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(fiber optics, be used in surgery)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(laser, assisted liposuction work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(laser, assisted liposuction work)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(laser, assisted liposuction work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(laser, be used in surgery)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(laser, assisted liposuction work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(laser, be used in surgery)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(laser, assisted liposuction work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(laser, be used in surgery)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(laser, assisted liposuction work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(laser, be used in surgery)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(laser, assisted liposuction work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(laser, be used in surgery)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(laser, assisted liposuction work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(laser, be used in surgery)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(laser, assisted liposuction work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(laser, be used in surgery)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(laser, assisted liposuction work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(laser, be used in surgery)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(laser, assisted liposuction work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(laser, assisted liposuction work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(laser, assisted liposuction work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(laser, assisted liposuction work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(laser, assisted liposuction work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(laser, assisted liposuction work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(fiber optics, be used in surgery)