laser: be at othamologist office

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.67
, electronic device
Weight: 0.66
, machine
Weight: 0.66
, instrument
Weight: 0.64
Siblings diode
Weight: 0.55
, spectrophotometer
Weight: 0.35
, cathode ray tube
Weight: 0.35
, digital camera
Weight: 0.35
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at office 1.00
be at othamologist office 1.00
be at dentist office 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(instrument, be at dentist office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(laser, be at othamologist office)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(machine, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(laser, be at othamologist office)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(laser, be at othamologist office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(machine, be at office)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(laser, be at othamologist office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(instrument, be at dentist office)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(laser, be at othamologist office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(machine, be at office)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(laser, be at othamologist office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be at dentist office)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(machine, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(laser, be at othamologist office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(laser, be at othamologist office)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(instrument, be at dentist office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(laser, be at othamologist office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(laser, be at othamologist office)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(laser, be at othamologist office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(laser, be at othamologist office)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(laser, be at othamologist office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(laser, be at othamologist office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(laser, be at othamologist office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(laser, be at othamologist office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(laser, be at othamologist office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(laser, be at othamologist office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(machine, be at office)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(laser, be at othamologist office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(instrument, be at dentist office)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(laser, be at othamologist office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(machine, be at office)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(laser, be at othamologist office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(instrument, be at dentist office)