laser: be at physic lab

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.67
, electronic device
Weight: 0.66
, machine
Weight: 0.66
, instrument
Weight: 0.64
Siblings diode
Weight: 0.55
, spectrophotometer
Weight: 0.35
, cathode ray tube
Weight: 0.35
, digital camera
Weight: 0.35
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at physic lab 1.00
be at laboratory 0.84
be at chemistry lab 0.84
be at optic lab 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(machine, be at laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(laser, be at physic lab)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(instrument, be at laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(laser, be at physic lab)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(laser, be at physic lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(instrument, be at laboratory)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(laser, be at physic lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(machine, be at laboratory)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(laser, be at physic lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be at laboratory)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(laser, be at physic lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(machine, be at laboratory)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(laser, be at physic lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, be at chemistry lab)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.19
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(machine, be at laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(laser, be at physic lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(laser, be at physic lab)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(instrument, be at laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(laser, be at physic lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(laser, be at physic lab)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(laser, be at physic lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(spectrophotometer, be at chemistry lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(spectrophotometer, be at chemistry lab)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(laser, be at physic lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(laser, be at physic lab)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(laser, be at physic lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(laser, be at laboratory)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(laser, be at physic lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(laser, be at laboratory)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(laser, be at physic lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(laser, be at optic lab)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(laser, be at physic lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(laser, be at laboratory)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(laser, be at physic lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(laser, be at laboratory)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(laser, be at physic lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(laser, be at optic lab)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(laser, be at physic lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(laser, be at optic lab)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(laser, be at physic lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(laser, be at optic lab)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(laser, be at physic lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(laser, be at physic lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(laser, be at physic lab)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(laser, be at physic lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(laser, be at physic lab)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(laser, be at physic lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(machine, be at laboratory)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(laser, be at physic lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(instrument, be at laboratory)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(laser, be at physic lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(spectrophotometer, be at chemistry lab)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(laser, be at physic lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(machine, be at laboratory)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(laser, be at physic lab) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(instrument, be at laboratory)