laser: be bad for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.67
, electronic device
Weight: 0.66
, machine
Weight: 0.66
, instrument
Weight: 0.64
Siblings diode
Weight: 0.35
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.35
, optics
Weight: 0.35
, spectrophotometer
Weight: 0.35
, cathode ray tube
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for dogs 1.00
be bad for cats 0.92
drive cats nuts 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(laser, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(laser, be bad for dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(laser, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(laser, be bad for cats)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(laser, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(laser, be bad for cats)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(laser, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(laser, be bad for cats)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(laser, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(laser, be bad for cats)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(laser, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(laser, drive cats nuts)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(laser, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(laser, drive cats nuts)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(laser, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(laser, drive cats nuts)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(laser, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(laser, drive cats nuts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(laser, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(laser, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(laser, be bad for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(laser, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(laser, be bad for dogs)