:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(lat, is workout)
⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(lat, is workout)
Similarity expansion
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lat, is workout)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(lat, is workouts)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(lat, is workout)
⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(lat, is workouts)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(lat, is workout)
⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(lat, is workouts)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(lat, is workout)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(lat, is workouts)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lat, is workout)
⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(lat, workouts)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(lat, is workout)
⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(lat, workouts)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(lat, is workout)
⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(lat, workouts)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(lat, is workout)
⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(lat, workout)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(lat, is workout)
⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lat, workouts)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(lat, is workout)
⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(lat, workout)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(lat, is workout)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lat, workout)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lat, is workout)
⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(lat, workout)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(lat, is workout)
⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(lat, fitness)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(lat, is workout)
⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(lat, is fitness)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(lat, is workout)
⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(lat, fitness)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(lat, is workout)
⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(lat, is fitness)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(lat, is workout)
⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lat, fitness)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lat, is workout)
⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(lat, fitness)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(lat, is workout)
⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(lat, is fitness)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lat, is workout)
⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(lat, is fitness)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(lat, is workout)
⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(lat, is workout)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings