latin america: have wide variety

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south africa
Weight: 0.79
, north america
Weight: 0.78
, africa
Weight: 0.76
, south america
Weight: 0.73
, european union
Weight: 0.72
Siblings puerto rico
Weight: 0.73
, central america
Weight: 0.70
, argentina
Weight: 0.68
, peru
Weight: 0.67
, canada
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
have wide variety 1.00
have wide variety of climates 0.89
have variety 0.89
have variety of climates 0.76
is diverse 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(latin america, have wide variety)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(canada, is diverse)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(latin america, have wide variety)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(canada, is diverse)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(canada, is diverse)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(latin america, have wide variety)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(latin america, have wide variety)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(latin america, have wide variety)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(latin america, have variety)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(latin america, have wide variety)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(latin america, have wide variety of climates)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(latin america, have wide variety)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(latin america, have wide variety of climates)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(latin america, have wide variety)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(latin america, have wide variety of climates)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(latin america, have wide variety)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(latin america, have wide variety of climates)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(latin america, have wide variety)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(latin america, have variety)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(latin america, have wide variety)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(latin america, have variety of climates)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(latin america, have wide variety)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(latin america, have variety)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(latin america, have wide variety)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(latin america, have variety of climates)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(latin america, have wide variety)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is diverse)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(latin america, have wide variety)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(latin america, have variety of climates)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(latin america, have wide variety)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(latin america, have variety)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(latin america, have wide variety)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(latin america, have variety of climates)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(latin america, have wide variety)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(latin america, is diverse)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(latin america, have wide variety)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(latin america, is diverse)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(latin america, have wide variety)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(latin america, is diverse)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(latin america, have wide variety)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(latin america, have wide variety)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(latin america, have wide variety)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(latin america, have wide variety)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(latin america, have wide variety)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(latin america, have wide variety)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(canada, is diverse)