law firm: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accounting firm
Weight: 0.75
, partner
Weight: 0.68
, business
Weight: 0.68
, firm
Weight: 0.61
Siblings company
Weight: 0.68
, lobbyist
Weight: 0.53
, software company
Weight: 0.36
, advertising agency
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(law firm, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(software company, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(law firm, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lobbyist, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(law firm, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(lobbyist, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lobbyist, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(law firm, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(software company, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(software company, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(law firm, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(law firm, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(law firm, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(law firm, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(law firm, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(law firm, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(law firm, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(law firm, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lobbyist, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(law firm, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(software company, has quality bad)