law: be in china

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prohibition
Weight: 0.74
, mandate
Weight: 0.68
, amendment
Weight: 0.68
, principle
Weight: 0.66
Siblings common law
Weight: 0.77
, ordinance
Weight: 0.68
, habeas corpus
Weight: 0.66
, freedom
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in china 1.00
be in china made 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(law, be in china)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(law, be in china)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(law, be in china)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(law, be in china made)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(law, be in china)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(law, be in china made)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(law, be in china)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(law, be in china made)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(law, be in china)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(law, be in china made)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(law, be in china)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(law, be in china)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(law, be in china)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(law, be in china)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(law, be in china)