lawyer: be present at sentence

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, arbitrator
Weight: 0.54
, fisher
Weight: 0.54
, judge
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be present at sentence 1.00
has primission to give sentence 0.93
order sentence 0.92
decide sentence 0.91
sentence criminal 0.90
decide criminal sentence 0.89
be responsible for sentence convict 0.88
be at prison 0.83
free convict of jail time 0.81
send person to prison 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(judge, send person to prison)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(judge, has primission to give sentence)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(judge, order sentence)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(judge, sentence criminal)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(judge, free convict of jail time)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(judge, be responsible for sentence convict)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(judge, decide sentence)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(judge, decide criminal sentence)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(judge, has primission to give sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(judge, has primission to give sentence)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(judge, sentence criminal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(judge, sentence criminal)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(judge, decide criminal sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(judge, decide criminal sentence)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(judge, decide sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(judge, decide sentence)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(judge, be responsible for sentence convict) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(judge, be responsible for sentence convict)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(judge, order sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(judge, order sentence)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(judge, free convict of jail time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(judge, free convict of jail time)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(judge, send person to prison) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(judge, send person to prison)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(lawyer, be present at sentence)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(lawyer, be at prison)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be at prison)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(lawyer, be at prison)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lawyer, be at prison)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be present at sentence)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(lawyer, be present at sentence)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(judge, decide sentence)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(judge, order sentence)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(judge, has primission to give sentence)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(judge, decide criminal sentence)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(judge, be responsible for sentence convict)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(judge, sentence criminal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(judge, free convict of jail time)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be present at sentence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(judge, send person to prison)