lawyer: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, barrister
Weight: 0.59
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, marshall
Weight: 0.56
, john marshall
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
be good 0.86
has quality wrong 0.85
make good excorcists 0.81
be great at 500 0.79
be good for system 0.79
has quality evil 0.78
get bad reputation 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(activist, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(lawyer, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(expert, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(lawyer, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(activist, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(expert, has quality wrong)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(expert, has quality wrong)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(activist, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(marshall, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(barrister, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(activist, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(lawyer, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(expert, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(lawyer, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(barrister, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(barrister, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(solicitor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(solicitor, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(marshall, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(marshall, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(solicitor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(solicitor, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(lawyer, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(lawyer, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(expert, has quality wrong)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(activist, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(marshall, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(barrister, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(solicitor, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(solicitor, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(activist, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(lawyer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(expert, has quality wrong)