lawyer: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, barrister
Weight: 0.59
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, marshall
Weight: 0.56
, john marshall
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is cheaper 0.85
is cheap 0.79
is expensive uk 0.78
cost money 0.77
is attractive 0.76
be expensive in usa 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(specialist, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(lawyer, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(lawyer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(specialist, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(specialist, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(marshall, is cheaper)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, is expensive uk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(marshall, is cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(specialist, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lawyer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(lawyer, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(lawyer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(solicitor, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(solicitor, is expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(lawyer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(marshall, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(marshall, is cheaper)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(lawyer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(marshall, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(marshall, is cheap)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(lawyer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(solicitor, is expensive uk)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(solicitor, is expensive uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(lawyer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(lawyer, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(lawyer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(lawyer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(lawyer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(lawyer, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(specialist, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(marshall, is cheaper)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(solicitor, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(marshall, is cheap)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(solicitor, is expensive uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(lawyer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(specialist, is expensive)