lawyer: is unhappy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, barrister
Weight: 0.59
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, marshall
Weight: 0.56
, john marshall
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
is unhappy 1.00
be unhappy with jobs 0.89
is worried 0.79
produce unhappiness 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(expert, is worried)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(lawyer, is unhappy)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(specialist, produce unhappiness)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(lawyer, is unhappy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lawyer, is unhappy)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(specialist, produce unhappiness)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lawyer, is unhappy)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(expert, is worried)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, is unhappy)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(specialist, produce unhappiness)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, is unhappy)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(expert, is worried)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(expert, is worried)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(lawyer, is unhappy)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lawyer, is unhappy)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(specialist, produce unhappiness)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(lawyer, is unhappy)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lawyer, is unhappy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lawyer, is unhappy)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(lawyer, is unhappy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(lawyer, is unhappy)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(lawyer, is unhappy)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, is unhappy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lawyer, is unhappy)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(lawyer, is unhappy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, is unhappy)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(specialist, produce unhappiness)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, is unhappy)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(expert, is worried)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(lawyer, is unhappy)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(specialist, produce unhappiness)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(lawyer, is unhappy)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(expert, is worried)