lawyer: use computers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, barrister
Weight: 0.59
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, marshall
Weight: 0.56
, john marshall
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
use computers 1.00
use technology 0.76
track down source of computer virus 0.76
use fax machines 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(investigator, track down source of computer virus)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lawyer, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(investigator, track down source of computer virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(investigator, track down source of computer virus)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lawyer, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(lawyer, use computers)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(lawyer, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(lawyer, use technology)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lawyer, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(lawyer, use technology)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(lawyer, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(lawyer, use technology)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(lawyer, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, use technology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(lawyer, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(lawyer, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, use computers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lawyer, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(lawyer, use computers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(investigator, track down source of computer virus)