lead pencil: be good marking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.54
, product
Weight: 0.49
, paper
Weight: 0.49
, medium
Weight: 0.41
Siblings pencil
Weight: 0.61
, mechanical pencil
Weight: 0.32
, razor blade
Weight: 0.32
, ballpoint pen
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good marking 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lead pencil, be good marking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pencil, be good marking)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(lead pencil, be good marking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(pencil, be good marking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(pencil, be good marking)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(lead pencil, be good marking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(lead pencil, be good marking)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(lead pencil, be good marking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(lead pencil, be good marking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lead pencil, be good marking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(lead pencil, be good marking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(lead pencil, be good marking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lead pencil, be good marking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(pencil, be good marking)