lead pencil: jammed finger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.54
, product
Weight: 0.49
, paper
Weight: 0.49
, medium
Weight: 0.41
Siblings pencil
Weight: 0.61
, mechanical pencil
Weight: 0.32
, razor blade
Weight: 0.32
, ballpoint pen
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
jammed finger 1.00
jammed thumb 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(lead pencil, jammed finger)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(pencil, jammed finger)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(lead pencil, jammed finger)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pencil, jammed thumb)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(lead pencil, jammed finger)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(pencil, jammed finger)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(pencil, jammed finger)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(lead pencil, jammed finger)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pencil, jammed thumb)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pencil, jammed thumb)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(lead pencil, jammed finger)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(lead pencil, jammed finger)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(lead pencil, jammed finger)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(lead pencil, jammed thumb)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lead pencil, jammed finger)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(lead pencil, jammed thumb)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(lead pencil, jammed finger)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(lead pencil, jammed thumb)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(lead pencil, jammed finger)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(lead pencil, jammed thumb)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lead pencil, jammed finger)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(lead pencil, jammed finger)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(lead pencil, jammed finger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(lead pencil, jammed finger)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(lead pencil, jammed finger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(lead pencil, jammed finger)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(pencil, jammed thumb)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(lead pencil, jammed finger)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pencil, jammed finger)