lead: was added to paints

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.61
, substance
Weight: 0.59
, hazard
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, material
Weight: 0.58
Siblings point
Weight: 0.64
, lead poisoning
Weight: 0.34
, momentum
Weight: 0.33
, second
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was added to paints 1.00
be in paints 0.96
be used in paints 0.96
was historically used in paints 0.89
was used in paint 0.84
be used in paints for plumbing pipes 0.82
be used in paint 0.81
be in paint 0.81
was removed from paint 0.80
be based paint bad 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lead, was added to paints)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(lead, was added to paints)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lead, was added to paints)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(lead, be used in paints)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lead, was added to paints)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(lead, be used in paints)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(lead, was added to paints)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(lead, be used in paints)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lead, was added to paints)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(lead, was historically used in paints)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lead, was added to paints)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(lead, was used in paint)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lead, was added to paints)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(lead, was historically used in paints)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lead, was added to paints)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(lead, was used in paint)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(lead, was added to paints)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(lead, was historically used in paints)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(lead, was added to paints)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lead, be used in paints)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(lead, was added to paints)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(lead, was used in paint)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(lead, was added to paints)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(lead, was historically used in paints)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(lead, was added to paints)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(lead, was used in paint)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(lead, was added to paints)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lead, was added to paints)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lead, was added to paints)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lead, was added to paints)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lead, was added to paints)