leaf: have plant

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motif
Weight: 0.64
, type
Weight: 0.58
, object
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
Siblings flower
Weight: 0.35
, bulb
Weight: 0.33
, vase
Weight: 0.33
, tree branch
Weight: 0.33
, lotus
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have plant 1.00
be on plant 0.98
be important to plant 0.96
do for plant 0.95
help plant 0.95
be in same plant 0.94
have green plant 0.92
be important part of plant 0.92
be called food factory of plant 0.92
be known as food factory of plant 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(type, be important to plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(leaf, have plant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(leaf, have plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(type, be important to plant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(leaf, have plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(type, be important to plant)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(leaf, have plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(flower, be important part of plant)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(leaf, have plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(flower, be important to plant)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(leaf, have plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(flower, help plant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(type, be important to plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(leaf, have plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(leaf, have plant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(leaf, have plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(flower, be important to plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(flower, be important to plant)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(leaf, have plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(flower, help plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(flower, help plant)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(leaf, have plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(flower, be important part of plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(flower, be important part of plant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(leaf, have plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(leaf, have plant)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(leaf, have plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(leaf, be on plant)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(leaf, have plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(leaf, be on plant)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(leaf, have plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(leaf, be important to plant)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(leaf, have plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(leaf, do for plant)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(leaf, have plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(leaf, be important to plant)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(leaf, have plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(leaf, have plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(leaf, have plant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(leaf, have plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(leaf, have plant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(leaf, have plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(type, be important to plant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(leaf, have plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(flower, help plant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(leaf, have plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(flower, be important to plant)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(leaf, have plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(flower, be important part of plant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(leaf, have plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(type, be important to plant)