league: be more popular in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organization
Weight: 0.68
, team
Weight: 0.66
, competition
Weight: 0.64
, title
Weight: 0.63
Siblings mlb
Weight: 0.58
, mls
Weight: 0.56
, ml
Weight: 0.51
, acc
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more popular in australia 1.00
be related australia 0.92
be cheaper in eu 0.76
do on korean pc 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(league, be more popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(league, be more popular in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(league, be more popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(league, be related australia)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(league, be more popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(league, be related australia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(league, be more popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(league, be related australia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(league, be more popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(league, do on korean pc)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(league, be more popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(league, do on korean pc)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(league, be more popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(league, be related australia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(league, be more popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(league, do on korean pc)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(league, be more popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(league, do on korean pc)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(league, be more popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(league, be cheaper in eu)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(league, be more popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(league, be cheaper in eu)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(league, be more popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(league, be cheaper in eu)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(league, be more popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(league, be cheaper in eu)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(league, be more popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(league, be more popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(league, be more popular in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(league, be more popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(league, be more popular in australia)