lease: have complicated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contract
Weight: 0.67
, grant
Weight: 0.64
, cost
Weight: 0.63
, financing
Weight: 0.61
, transfer
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ground rent
Weight: 0.34
, deal
Weight: 0.33
, operating expense
Weight: 0.32
, bridge loan
Weight: 0.32
, income tax
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have complicated 1.00
is difficult 0.80
is more expensive 0.77
is expensive 0.77
is expensive now 0.75
be with frustrating 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(financing, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(lease, have complicated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(lease, have complicated)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(financing, is difficult)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lease, have complicated)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(financing, is difficult)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lease, have complicated)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(deal, is more expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(financing, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(lease, have complicated)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(lease, have complicated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(lease, have complicated)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(deal, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(deal, is more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(lease, have complicated)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(lease, have complicated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(lease, have complicated)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(lease, have complicated)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lease, have complicated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(lease, have complicated)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(lease, have complicated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lease, have complicated)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(financing, is difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lease, have complicated)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(deal, is more expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(lease, have complicated)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(financing, is difficult)